Archive for the ‘Sustainable Mail’ Category

Further Restrictions on Landfill and Returned Mail

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

I am thinking how will this affect the Direct Mail Sector? There are  targets set to reduce all waste paper generated by direct mail going to landfill as there is already the issue of ‘producer responsibility’ in that all waste paper generated is disposed of properly. 80% of the carbon footprint for a piece of mail is in this ‘end of life’ solution.

Our service includes safe destruction and recycling of all waste paper and  helps meet the requirements of PAS2020 and Sustainable Mail

Consultation on the introduction of restrictions on the landfilling of certain wastes
1. I am writing to invite views on the possible introduction of further restrictions on the landfilling of biodegradable and recyclable wastes in England and Wales.
2. This joint Defra and Welsh Assembly Government consultation is in response to the commitment in the Waste Strategy for England 2007 and the commitment of the Welsh Minister for Environment, Sustainability and Housing’s written cabinet statement of 2nd December 2009 to consult on whether the introduction of further restrictions on the landfilling of biodegradable and recyclable wastes would make an effective contribution to meeting the objectives set out in the respective waste strategies for England and Wales, of reducing GHG emissions and increasing resource efficiency and in respect of Wales, of decreasing the ecological footprint associated with waste. The consultation aims to obtain the views of interested parties on the policy options presented with a view towards introducing one or more of them into law(s) in England and Wales.
3. This is a first stage consultation on the options under consideration for restricting wastes from landfill. It is intended to be a high-level consultation to identify preferred option(s) which could be taken forward if desirable, practical and affordable. If Government decides change is desirable a second stage consultation will follow on the preferred option(s) and the way any restriction or requirement would be introduced and who the onus would fall upon and accompanied by draft Regulations to implement these option(s).
4. The following documents may be found on Defra’s website at:
www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/landfill-restrictions/index.htm
and on the Welsh Assembly Government’s website at:

www.wales.gov.uk/consultations / www.cymru.gov.uk/ymgynghoriadau

Issued: 2010-03-18
Consultation starts: 2010-03-18
Consultation closes: 2010-06-10

The Benefits of using a 2d bar code

Tuesday, March 23rd, 2010

We have are licensed by Arbutus Ridge to process the CodEffect 2d barcode, a powerful method of encoding large amounts of data. It has been used by HMRC for some time now and is completely secure.

It attracts a lower charge rate to capture than standard alpha/numeric data and we can return the data files on a daily basis if required.

CodEffect has 2 distinct elements – simple data capture from returns and data verification/enhancement. These are 2 distinct and separate services, designed so that users can ‘buy-in’ to both services, however this is not mandatory.

Veridata through Arbutus Ridge will provide all software required to manage printing of the CodEffect 2d barcodes free of charge and will work alongside the Client and chosen print company to install and test the process. Full technical requirements will be produced on agreement of contract

The cost of processing your returns, and capturing additional valuable marketing information, is greatly reduced by using this intelligent 2dbar code.

For further information on how you can dramatically reduced costs and stay ahead of the competition call: -

Tim Craig on 01244 350700

CodEffect 2d bar code cuts cost of returns dramatically

Friday, March 19th, 2010

Since using CodEffect 2dbar code one major blue chip, who mail out in the millions, have seen a 50% reduction of the cost of processing  their returned mail.

We could do the same fore you.

Direct Mail and the Government voluntary producer responsibility agreements

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Action by the Direct Marketing Association

Further develop the MPS system (Mailing Preference Service) to improve the targeting element and provide greater flexibility for both the consumer and the producer; and further increase awareness of the service among householders

Work with WRAP to develop a ‘recycle logo’ to be printed on all direct mail

Work with WRAP, the paper mills and adhesive manufacturers to minimise the use of materials that may contaminate the recycling process

Work with local authorities to develop appropriate messages about recycling direct mail and other promotional material

Now all taken up by DMA initiative  PAS 2020

Landfill – Newspapers, magazines and direct mail and the paper sector

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Paper has been identified as a material where reduced waste and greater recycling can yield significant environmental benefits.

The Government has already concluded voluntary producer responsibility agreements to promote, in particular, increased recycling of newspapers, magazines and direct mail with the Newspaper Publishers Association (NPA), the Periodical Publishers Association (PPA) and the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) respectively.

These three waste streams are estimated to amount to about 3.6 million tonnes (which would equate to about 14% of total household waste).

Direct marketing material estimated to account for approximately 550,000 tonnes of the household waste stream. Of this, 181,500 tonnes is estimated to be addressed direct mail with the remaining 368,500 tonnes being unaddressed direct marketing material.

PEFC The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification

Monday, March 15th, 2010

The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) is an international non-profit, non-governmental organization dedicated to promoting Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) through independent third-party certification.

PEFC works throughout the entire forest supply chain to promote good practice in the forest and to ensure that timber and non-timber forest products are produced with respect for the highest ecological, social and ethical standards. Thanks to its  eco-label, customers and consumers are able to identify products from sustainably managed forests.

PEFC is an umbrella organization. It works by endorsing national forest certification systems developed through multi-stakeholder processes and tailored to local priorities and conditions.

With about 30 endorsed national certification systems and more than 220 million hectares of certified forests, PEFC is the world’s largest forest certification system.

http://www.pefc.org

Royal Mail Sustainable Mail & PEFC

Monday, March 15th, 2010

Royal Mail Recognition for PEFC

MAR 11 2010 | UNITED KINGDOM

As a key part of its environmental policy, the British postal service, Royal Mail, has developed a standard for responsible mailing, Sustainable Mail. To qualify for the scheme, organisations must comply with a number of criteria including use of recycled content or paper certified to a credible certification scheme such as PEFC’s.*

The Sustainable Mail™ standard is closely aligned to the British Standards Institute’s specification document on environmental performance of Direct Marketing, PAS 2020. Meeting the new standard enables companies using direct mail in their marketing mix to demonstrate their commitment to recycling, sustainability and waste reduction as well as helping to improve their overall corporate environmental performance.

Full compliance with the standard gives a reduction in postage costs of almost 5%, and as these costs represent up to 70% of the cost of a direct mail campaign, the savings can be significant.

Virgin fibre certified to a certification scheme approved by DEFRA’s Central Point of Expertise on Timber (CPET) such as PEFC is considered an environmentally-friendly option as it contributes to a reduction in carbon in the atmosphere and is readily renewable. There are also limits to the amount of recycled paper available since paper cannot be recycled indefinitely.

“In addition to decreasing an organization’s environmental footprint, Sustainable Mail allows for major cost reductions”, said Hilary Khawam, PEFC UK Communications Director. “With PEFC-certified paper widely available in the UK, there are numerous responsible sourcing options available to companies wishing to take advantage of this scheme.”

*The Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) s an international non-profit, non-governmental organization dedicated to promoting Sustainable Forest Management (SFM) through independent third-party certification.

http://www.hellmail.co.uk

Recycling you know it makes sense

Friday, March 12th, 2010

Recycling paper products allows more trees to remain standing, where they can continue to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere

Incinerators are the single largest sources of dioxin, the most toxic made-made substance known to science, according to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Lancet, a UK medical journal.

EPA states the greenhouse gas emissions from waste combustion in incinerators are reduced when materials are diverted to recycling

Landfill materials potentially pollute the air, land, water, and, of course, alter the climate.

EPA states the greenhouse gas emissions from waste combustion in incinerators are reduced when materials are diverted to recycling.

Recycling aluminum cans saves 95 percent of the energy required to make same amount of aluminum from virgin source, bauxide

We recycle all waste paper generated from returned mail. Our solution helps you meet the requirements of PAS2020 and Sustainable Mail through our local, secure recycling process

Landfill Tax Reaches £40 per Tonne

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Landfill Tax Reaches £40 per Tonne

Posted by Joe Hind under General | Tags: landfill tax, waste |
1 Comment

It now costs an additional £40 per tonne to send most types of waste to landfill.

Landfill Site in UK

The total costs are actually much higher than £40 as most businesses will pay a company or local authority to collect their waste and will be charged for the other elements, over and above the tax. Whoever does the collection has to pay for:

  • Transport to Collect the Rubbish.
  • Guys to Pick up the Rubbish.
  • A Plant or Depot to Process/Separate/Crush the Waste.
  • Transport to the Landfill Site.
  • Landfill Gate Fees.

So the real cost of waste to landfill is much higher than just the £40 tax.

But, I hear you say, most of those costs are the same for recycling so it doesn’t really matter!

Well yes, it is true that recycling carries a cost. But the development of recycling infrastructure, coupled with the inevitable increase in the cost of raw materials as we literally use them up, means that the business model for recycling services has started to look very robust.

Also, consider why the Government imposed the landfill tax in the first place. It’s not just about helping the environment but also the fact that we are running out of space for landfill sites. Current sites are reaching capacity and new landfill sites are pretty much the least popular choice, apart from Nuclear Waste Dumps, for ways to use land in the UK, particularly for those living nearby!

We all have to make a decision about our waste, and the knowledge that landfill tax is likely to rise year-on-year (by £8 a tonne until 2011 at least) might make a difference to what you decide is best for your business.

Defra research on landfill bans

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

Defra research on landfill bans

Liz Gyekye
08 Sep 2009

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs is researching how landfill bans on materials such as paper, food, glass, aluminium or wood could be implemented in the UK.
It comes after environmental charity Green Alliance recently completed a consultancy report for Defra called Landfill bans and restrictions in the EU and US ( August 2009).
The aim of the report was to analyse four EU countries (Austria, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands), the Flanders region of Belgium and a US state (Massachusetts) that have implemented restrictions or bans on the landfilling of a range of waste materials.
The reports summary states: “We feel that this project is timely. Despite an impressive increase in household recycling rates in recent years, the UK is still heavily reliant on landfill, the final destination for 54 per cent of municipal waste, 41 per cent of commercial and industrial waste and 31 per cent of construction and demolition waste.”
A Defra spokeswoman told MRW: “The research we’ve published shows not only that landfill bans have been very effective in other countries and regions – waste to landfill in Germany decreased from 27 per cent to 1 per cent, for example – among other interesting results. It also shows that these countries and regions already had pretty good recycling rates by the time they introduced landfill bans – between around 30 per cent and 50 per cent. In the UK our recycling rate is currently 36 per cent, so we’re certainly on the right road, but we are still sending 54 per cent of our waste to landfill.”
Defra has been exploring the possibility of banning or restricting some materials for some time. In June, when announcing the Packaging Strategy, Environment Secretary Hilary Benn said: “Take food, glass, aluminium or wood – why would you put any of them into landfill when they can be recycled, or used to make energy? What sort of a society would throw away aluminium cans worth £550 a tonne when aluminium producers are crying out for the raw material?”
The Landfill bans and a restriction in the EU and US report asserts that “it is not clear that landfill tax will be sufficient on its own to attract the necessary investment in alternatives [to landfill]”.
A Defra spokeswoman said: “In terms of next steps, we’re also researching how landfill bans could work in this country – what infrastructure and resources would be needed, what the impact would be, how effective it would be, etc – this research will be published in October/November.
We then aim to consult on proposed landfill bans for certain materials by the end of the year/beginning of next year. Our argument is that the research published shows that landfill bans work, and have been working in a number of places for years, so why shouldn’t they work here – that’s essentially what we want to know and that is our next step.”
The results of the report show that all the countries in the study believe that the landfill bans had succeeded in achieving their objectives. However, there were differing emphases on what should replace landfill and interviewees said that landfill bans and restrictions had been deployed as one instrument in a range of fiscal, regulatory and other interventions aimed at diverting waste away from landfill.